Search reports, ask a question, or jump to a page.
The problem
Intervention: None—this is an observational study examining associations, not an intervention evaluation
Who it was tested with: 5,480 married adolescent and young girls aged 13–23 years from the UDAYA survey (2018–2019), India.
Experience from people who deliver programmes: stories, case studies and lessons learned. Valuable for understanding how and why, and for spotting what to test next, but not a measure of effect.
"Data were drawn from the second wave of the Understanding the lives of adolescents and young adults (UDAYA) survey (2018–2019). The sample size was 5480 married adolescent and young girls aged 13–23 years. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis and structural equation modelling (SEM) were performed." The study uses a large survey sample with multivariate statistical analysis but lacks a comparison group and prospective follow-up, making it observational research that documents associations rather than testing an intervention.
Cross-sectional design with retrospective self-report data prevents causal inference. The study cannot determine whether exposure to violence directly causes IPV victimization or whether other unmeasured factors mediate this relationship. Temporal sequence of events cannot be established.
Across countries and designs
50 studies · 32 countries
Confirmed by a peer reviewer
A reviewer checked the classification against the source.
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 · synth-v1
