Search reports, ask a question, or jump to a page.
The problem
Intervention: No specific intervention was tested; this is an observational study examining the association between parent language comfort and adverse event rates
Who it was tested with: 1,666 parents of hospitalized children aged 17 years and younger across 7 pediatric units in North America; 147 (8.8%) expressed limited comfort with English.
Children or communities are compared with a group that did not receive the intervention, or followed over years. This is the design that best separates what the intervention did from everything else that changed.
"Adverse events were collected using a systematic 2-step methodology. First, clinician abstractors reviewed patient medical records, solicited clinician reports, hospital incident reports, and family safety interviews. Then, review and consensus classification were completed by physician pairs." This rigorous methodology with multiple data sources and structured classification provides strong evidence of adverse event identification, though the study's observational design means it demonstrates association rather than proving that language comfort directly causes differences in safety outcomes.
The study measured only parent self-reported language comfort, not objective language proficiency or documentation of interpreter use. The observational design cannot establish causation. The study does not identify the specific mechanisms by which language barriers increase adverse events or evaluate whether language access services modify this risk.
Across countries and designs
5 studies · 5 countries
