Search reports, ask a question, or jump to a page.
The problem
Intervention: No intervention tested; this is a comparative descriptive study
Who it was tested with: 49 children in Kediri City (urban) and Dusun Bulakdawung village (rural), Indonesia.
Experience from people who deliver programmes: stories, case studies and lessons learned. Valuable for understanding how and why, and for spotting what to test next, but not a measure of effect.
"The research method used a comparative observation with the population of children in the City of Bangsal Kediri and Dusun Bulakdawung, Parang Kediri Village, with a sample of 49 children. Sampling using Nutritional Status based on BB/U and TB/U." The study compares nutritional status across settings but does not test an intervention, making it descriptive rather than evaluative evidence.
Small sample size of 49 children from only two locations. Cross-sectional design cannot establish causation. No intervention evaluated. Limited data on confounding factors such as age distribution, socioeconomic status, or healthcare access.
Across countries and designs
5 studies · 5 countries
