Search reports, ask a question, or jump to a page.
The problem
Intervention: Educational and awareness interventions (implications discussed but not specifically tested in this study)
Who it was tested with: Australian children aged 10-17 (N=304), proportionally representing the broader population.
Experience from people who deliver programmes: stories, case studies and lessons learned. Valuable for understanding how and why, and for spotting what to test next, but not a measure of effect.
"The survey measured communication experiences related to 12 grooming and solicitation strategies from strangers, including comfort levels, perceived communicator age, and responses. It also assessed relationships with individual factors, digital engagements and safety practices." The study documents children's experiences and risk factors rather than evaluating an intervention's effectiveness, placing it at the practitioner/descriptive evidence tier.
Cross-sectional design cannot establish causality; relies on children's self-report and perception; single country context limits generalizability; the study examines prevalence and associations but does not test the effectiveness of any protective intervention
Across countries and designs
2 studies · 1 country
