Meaning-making in community-directed interventions: A social capital theory perspective from the post-conflict Northern Uganda Youth Livelihood Programme
Research on meaning-making in development policy is scarce, yet essential for contextualizing development interventions. The study demonstrates that policy implementation in post-conflict situations is vulnerable to meaning displacement when locally constructed meanings and the social capital through which they are produced and circulated are overlooked, with consequential effects for programme legitimacy, participation and effectiveness. A phenomenological research design adopting focus group discussions with former beneficiaries of the Youth Livelihood Programme and in-depth interviews with key informants was conducted in Kitgum District. The study used a content thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology to analyse the data. The findings indicate that the youth constructed several meanings and perceptions of the Youth Livelihood Programme, including (i) perceived political meanings, (ii) free money perception, (iii) pocket money from the President meaning, (iv) drinking money narrative, (v) loot without fear perception, (vi) the mimic perception “money for the community poorest people”, and (vii) our tax money being returned perception. In conclusion, as community-directed interventions enter the community with an official, formal meaning, these meanings are not automatically reproduced at the community level. Instead, informal meanings are socially reconstructed through interactions building on existing community social capital, resulting in meaning displacement. Thus, development policy actors ought to pay attention to socially constructed meanings in order to align programme and make policy adjustments required for effective policy implementation.
Benard Cankara, James Mugisha, Elizabeth Kyazike