Peer-reviewed article
An empirical study on the impact of aesthetic education activities on primary school students' moral emotions and behaviors: Based on a quasi-experimental design.
Pengkai Chen, Chaofang Zhong ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This study tested whether aesthetic education activities improve moral emotions and prosocial behaviors in primary school children in China. Two hundred students in grades 3-6 from two schools were randomly assigned to participate in a 12-week aesthetic education program or serve as controls. Students who participated showed increased empathy and helping behavior compared to controls, with effects lasting at least three months after the program ended. The benefits were stronger for girls and younger students.
Key points
- Experimental group students showed higher post-test scores in empathy and helping behavior after the 12-week intervention
- Positive intervention effects on cooperative behavior were observed and relatively stable
- Three-month follow-up measurement showed intervention-related differences demonstrated continuity over time
- Girls showed more pronounced gains in empathy compared to boys
- Higher-grade students showed smaller gains in helping behavior than lower-grade students
Limitations
The study was conducted in only two public primary schools in one city in eastern China, so results may not generalize to other regions or school settings. The document does not provide details on the specific content or quality of the aesthetic education activities delivered.
Abstract
This study adopts a quasi-experimental design to systematically examine the relationship between aesthetic education activities and primary school students' moral emotions and prosocial behaviors, and to provide a preliminary analysis of possible emotion-behavior links. Based on the theory of emotional cognition, social learning theory, and a cautious quasi-experimental evaluation perspective, an analytical model of "aesthetic education intervention-moral emotions-prosocial behaviors" is constructed, and a multi-model quasi-experimental analysis framework consisting of multiple regression, moderation analysis, and difference-in-differences (DID) is proposed. Propensity score matching is also employed for robustness checks. The study selected 200 students from grades 3 to 6 in two public primary schools in a provincial capital city in eastern China, who were evenly divided into experimental and control groups. A 12-week systematic aesthetic education activity was implemented, focusing on core outcome variables such as empathy ability, moral identity, helping behavior, and cooperative behavior. The results indicate that, after controlling for baseline differences and family socioeconomic background, students in the experimental group showed higher post-test scores in empathy and helping behavior, and a relatively stable positive pattern in cooperative behavior. The delayed measurement three months after the intervention further suggested that these intervention-related differences showed a certain degree of continuity. Moderation analysis indicated that gender and grade were associated with heterogeneous intervention-related patterns, with girls showing more pronounced gains in empathy and higher-grade students showing smaller gains in helping behavior. The main contribution of this paper lies in proposing a replicable multi-model quasi-experimental analysis framework and providing cautious empirical evidence for understanding the relationship between aesthetic education activities and the development of primary school students' moral emotions and prosocial behaviors.
Findings the Hub has extracted
Each claim below is labelled by its type of design and links back to this report.
- Intervention
- Systematic aesthetic education activities delivered over 12 weeks, focusing on activities designed to develop empathy ability, moral identity, helping behavior, and cooperative behavior
- Population
- 200 primary school students in grades 3-6 from two public schools in eastern China
Key finding
Experimental group showed higher post-test scores in empathy and helping behavior after controlling for baseline differences and family socioeconomic background
Chen et al. · PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) · 10 Jun 2026