Peer-reviewed article
The Effectiveness of Women and Girls Safe Spaces: A Systematic Review of Evidence to Address Violence Against Women and Girls in Humanitarian Contexts
Lindsay Stark, Mackenzie V. Robinson, Ilana Seff, Alli Gillespie, Jonathan Colarelli et al. ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This systematic review examined seven evaluations of Women and Girls Safe Spaces (WGSS) programs implemented in humanitarian contexts across seven African and Asian countries. The programs did not demonstrate reductions in violence against women and girls, though three evaluations showed modest improvements in psychosocial well-being and social support. Only three of the seven studies used rigorous research methods, indicating a significant gap in high-quality evidence on this widely implemented intervention.
Key points
- One in three women and girls will experience violence in their lifetime, with higher rates in conflict and post-conflict settings
- No studies reported reductions in exposure to or incidence of VAWG among WGSS program participants
- Three evaluations showed moderate improvements in psychosocial well-being, social support, and attitudes toward rites of passage
- Only three of seven evaluations employed rigorous methodologies
- There is a paucity of quantitative evidence on WGSS impact despite widespread implementation
Limitations
The review is limited to quantitative evidence only, which may exclude important qualitative findings about program mechanisms or context-specific outcomes. The small number of rigorous studies limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions about WGSS effectiveness.
Abstract
One in three women and girls will experience violence in their lifetime. In conflict and postconflict settings, the incidence of violence against women and girls (VAWG) is exacerbated, resulting in increased negative social, economic, health, and psychosocial effects. In an attempt to prevent and respond to the occurrence of VAWG in humanitarian settings, Women and Girls Safe Spaces (WGSS) have been promoted as a promising intervention. The authors conducted a systematic review to examine the current quantitative evidence available on the impact and effectiveness of WGSS programs. The authors reviewed relevant peer-reviewed and gray literature using predefined search terms for potential inclusion. Seven records met inclusion criteria. Records included evaluations of WGSS programs implemented in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania, Kenya, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. While none of the studies reported reductions in exposure to or incidence of VAWG among program participants, three evaluations demonstrated moderate improvements in psychosocial well-being, social support, and attitudes toward rites of passage. Additionally, only three of the seven evaluations employed rigorous methodologies. This study illustrates the paucity of existing quantitative evidence around the impact of WGSS and the need for further research examining the potential benefits of this widely implemented intervention for women and girls. A stronger evidence base has the potential to inform policy and program development and to help governments, organizations, and communities better allocate limited resources in response to VAWG.
Findings the Hub has extracted
Each claim below is labelled by its type of design and links back to this report.
- Intervention
- Women and Girls Safe Spaces (WGSS) programs
- Population
- Women and girls in humanitarian contexts across Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania, Kenya, Bangladesh, and Pakistan
Key finding
No studies reported reductions in exposure to or incidence of VAWG among program participants
Stark et al. · Prof. Lindsay Stark (OpenAlex works) · 22 Feb 2021