Search reports, ask a question, or jump to a page.
The problem
Intervention: Descriptive analysis of immunization coverage, caregiver knowledge, and satisfaction with non-NIP vaccines across family types; identification of associated factors to inform future promotion strategies
Who it was tested with: 1,648 caregivers of children aged 1-6 years in urban Zhejiang and rural Henan provinces, stratified into local urban, migrant, non-left-behind, and left-behind family types.
Experience from people who deliver programmes: stories, case studies and lessons learned. Valuable for understanding how and why, and for spotting what to test next, but not a measure of effect.
"A cross-sectional survey was conducted in urban areas of Zhejiang and rural areas of Henan in China. A total of 1648 caregivers of children aged 1-6 years were interviewed face-to-face by a pre-designed online questionnaire, and their families were grouped into four types: local urban, migrant, non-left-behind, and left-behind." This describes an observational study documenting disparities in immunization and associated factors, which can guide future intervention development but does not test an intervention's effectiveness.
This is a descriptive study identifying disparities and associations rather than evaluating a specific intervention; it cannot determine causation or effectiveness of strategies. The study relies on self-reported data and cross-sectional design.
Across countries and designs
1 study · 1 country
