Search reports, ask a question, or jump to a page.
The problem
Intervention: School-based comprehensive sexuality education interventions for sexual violence prevention
Who it was tested with: High school adolescents in school contexts.
Children or communities are compared with a group that did not receive the intervention, or followed over years. This is the design that best separates what the intervention did from everything else that changed.
"The PRISMA guidelines and PICOS criteria were used to identify, select, evaluate, and synthesize the included studies" with "Risk of bias systematically assessed using design-specific tools according to study type." The review employed rigorous systematic methodology to synthesize evidence across multiple study designs, though the heterogeneity of those designs and measurement approaches limited the strength of conclusions about intervention effectiveness.
Heterogeneous methodological designs restricted generalizability; convenience sampling common; lack of follow-up data; limited consideration of intersectionality (race, gender, sexuality); exclusion of LGBTQIAPN+ specific content; evaluation measures may not have captured sexual violence prevention adequately
Across countries and designs
1 study · 0 countries
