Search reports, ask a question, or jump to a page.
The problem
Intervention: Understanding motivators for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance through mixed-methods research combining survey data and in-depth interviews
Who it was tested with: 237 families in Swat District with children under 2 years of age who had incomplete routine immunization; 18 household members participated in in-depth interviews.
Experience from people who deliver programmes: stories, case studies and lessons learned. Valuable for understanding how and why, and for spotting what to test next, but not a measure of effect.
"A cross-sectional survey assessed COVID-19 vaccination in household members of children under 2 years of age for whom vaccination registries showed missed routine vaccinations. In-depth interviews with 18 household members explored motivations for vaccine acceptance through thematic analysis." This is a qualitative-descriptive study documenting barriers and motivators rather than testing an intervention designed to improve immunization, so evidence tier is PRACTITIONER and outcome is INCONCLUSIVE as the study aims to understand motivations rather than demonstrate effectiveness of a solution.
This is a descriptive and exploratory study without a comparison group, so it cannot determine causation or whether interventions based on identified motivators would improve childhood immunization rates. The study identifies correlations and motivational factors but does not test an intervention.
Across countries and designs
1 study · 1 country
