Search reports, ask a question, or jump to a page.
The problem
Intervention: Not an intervention study; comparison of stunted vs. non-stunted children
Who it was tested with: Children under five.
Experience from people who deliver programmes: stories, case studies and lessons learned. Valuable for understanding how and why, and for spotting what to test next, but not a measure of effect.
"This study was a systematic review and a meta-analysis. The articles were searched systematically and comprehensively through several databases including Pubmed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar published from 2010 to 2020." The study combines results from multiple observational studies to establish the association between stunting and developmental outcomes, making it a synthesis of evidence that supports causal relationships.
Only five studies included; quality of included studies not described; heterogeneity not discussed; definition of 'abnormal development' varies across studies
Across countries and designs
1 study · 1 country
