Search reports, ask a question, or jump to a page.
The problem
Intervention: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program Seminar Series delivered via telehealth in primary schools
Who it was tested with: 2,272 parents from Australian primary schools.
Children or communities are compared with a group that did not receive the intervention, or followed over years. This is the design that best separates what the intervention did from everything else that changed.
"We utilised data collected as part of a cluster randomised trial of a telehealth-delivered Triple P - Positive Parenting Program Seminar Series in Australian primary schools (N = 2272 parents) to assess parent participation. Thirteen participation outcomes were assessed across three domains: registration, seminar attendance, and time spent in sessions." The study uses a rigorous experimental design but finds that traditional predictive approaches fail to explain parent participation, suggesting current understanding is fundamentally incomplete.
Secondary analysis approach with exploratory rather than hypothesis-driven testing; large number of comparisons increases risk of false positives; findings limited to one program context in Australia
Across countries and designs
1 study · 1 country
