Search reports, ask a question, or jump to a page.
The problem
Intervention: Measurement and analysis of the relationship between stunting status, salivary factors (pH and buffering capacity), dental caries, and oral health-related quality of life using validated scales and clinical assessments
Who it was tested with: 210 preschool children aged 24-59 months in Bandung, Indonesia, divided equally into stunted (height-for-age z-score <-2 SD) and non-stunted groups.
Experience from people who deliver programmes: stories, case studies and lessons learned. Valuable for understanding how and why, and for spotting what to test next, but not a measure of effect.
"This analytical cross-sectional study included 210 preschool children aged 24-59 months in Bandung, Indonesia, equally divided into stunted and non-stunted groups... Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, and t-tests, followed by logistic regression with interaction terms to examine effect modification by stunting." The study used cross-sectional comparison with regression analysis to examine whether stunting modifies oral health outcomes, but the concurrent measurement design without baseline or follow-up limits causal understanding.
Cross-sectional design prevents causal inference; cannot explain the paradoxical finding of fewer cavities in stunted children despite more acidic saliva; measures associations at a single time point; uses dichotomous ECOHIS response format which may not capture subtle quality of life differences
Across countries and designs
1 study · 1 country
