Search reports, ask a question, or jump to a page.
The problem
Intervention: Assessment of procedural memory and procedural learning using serial reaction time and end-state comfort tasks, compared with school-age language outcomes
Who it was tested with: 79 children aged 7;5-10;5 years, 43 with a history of late talking and 36 with typical early language development.
Experience from people who deliver programmes: stories, case studies and lessons learned. Valuable for understanding how and why, and for spotting what to test next, but not a measure of effect.
"Aspects of procedural memory, procedural learning and motor planning were assessed using the serial reaction time and the end-state comfort tasks. School-age language abilities were measured using standardized tests." The study design uses standardised assessments to measure associations between procedural learning and language outcomes in children with different developmental histories.
This is a cross-sectional study without longitudinal follow-up to determine causal relationships. The study assesses associations rather than testing an intervention, and measures procedural learning retrospectively in school-age children rather than prospectively in toddlers.
Across countries and designs
1 study · 2 countries