Peer-reviewed article
Can International Income Transfers Reduce the Use of Child Labour?
Bharati Basu ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This peer-reviewed article examines how international income transfers, such as remittances from high-income countries, could reduce child labour by improving economic conditions in recipient countries. The research proposes that income transfers change trade terms in favour of receiving countries, offering an alternative to traditional child labour bans. The approach aims to address child labour without creating economic disruption or requiring governments to bear significant costs.
Key points
- Income transfers from high-income countries can reduce child labour by improving economic conditions in recipient countries
- This policy mechanism works by turning the terms of trade in favour of transfer-receiving countries
- Income transfers offer an alternative to child labour bans and other restrictive policies
- The approach does not impose significant financial burden on national governments
- The method addresses inequities in global labour markets without creating economic turmoil
Limitations
The document is an abstract or summary that does not provide empirical data, specific study design details, or evidence of the effectiveness of income transfers in reducing child labour. It is unclear whether this represents theoretical analysis, modelling, or empirical research findings.
Abstract
This article shows how a policy of income transfer, such as remittance payments from a high-income country, can reduce child labour, a target for the UN Sustainable Development Goals, by turning the terms of trade in favour of the transfer-receiving country. This is a novel policy measure because it utilises an existing international economic event, known as income transfer, without imposing a significant financial burden on national governments. This reduces inequities in the global labour market without creating economic and non-economic turmoil resulting from policies involving bans or other alternatives to bans.