Peer-reviewed article
Effects of a “care for child development” model intervention on neurodevelopment and ASQ scores in high-risk infants
Ting Yu, Tianze Ding, Yu Zhang, Shiwei Ai ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This study tested whether counseling about child development and group nurturing care activities could improve the developmental outcomes of high-risk newborns in China. Researchers compared 102 infants who received both interventions with 102 who received only routine follow-up care. Infants in the intervention group showed significantly better scores on neurological and developmental tests when assessed at four to six months of age. The findings suggest that targeted nurturing care interventions can effectively support early development in at-risk infants.
Key points
- Intervention group showed significantly higher median INFANIB scores (70 vs. 66, P = 0.004)
- Intervention group scored significantly higher across all five ASQ domains (all P < 0.001)
- Improvements seen in communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving, and personal-social development
- The integrated model combines child development counseling with nurturing care group activities
- Authors recommend including this model in routine follow-up programs for high-risk infants
Limitations
The study uses quasi-random allocation rather than full randomization, which may introduce selection bias. The follow-up period is relatively short (four to six months), so long-term effects on child development are unknown.
Abstract
Family nurturing is increasingly recognized as critical for improving the prognosis of high-risk infants. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of targeted nurturing care interventions remains limited. This study aimed to explore the effects of care for child development counseling and nurturing care group activities on the developmental outcomes of high-risk infants, as well as their applicability in clinical management. In total, 102 high-risk newborns were allocated using a quasi-random alternation method to either an intervention group ( n = 51), which received both interventions, or a control group (n = 51), which received only routine follow-up care. The primary developmental outcomes were assessed using the Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) when the infants were between four and six months of age. The intervention group showed significantly higher median [IQR] total INFANIB scores than the control group (70 [64–72] vs. 66 [59–70]; P = 0.004). Furthermore, the intervention group exhibited significantly higher scores in all five ASQ domains (all P < 0.001), including communication (50 [45–60] vs. 45 [35–50]), gross motor (50 [40–55] vs. 35 [20–45]), fine motor (40 [30–50] vs. 30 [20–40]), problem-solving (45 [35–57.5] vs. 35 [25–40]), and personal-social (45 [37.5–55] vs. 40 [25–42.5]). These findings suggest that childcare development counseling and nurturing care group activities can effectively enhance the neurodevelopmental and cognitive abilities of high-risk infants. This integrated model promises an effective strategy for promoting early development in this population and should be considered for inclusion in routine follow-up programs.
Findings the Hub has extracted
Each claim below is labelled by its type of design and links back to this report.
- Intervention
- Care for child development counseling combined with nurturing care group activities
- Population
- 102 high-risk newborns in China (51 intervention, 51 control)
Key finding
Intervention group median INFANIB score 70 vs. control 66 (P = 0.004)