Peer-reviewed article
The meanings of ‘child participation’ in international and European policies on children(’s rights): A content analysis
Chiara Carla Montà ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This peer-reviewed paper analyzes how the term 'child participation' is defined and used in international and European policy documents on children's rights. The authors argue that policy frameworks shape what children can learn and do in society, and that understanding how participation is conceptualized in these policies is important because it reflects underlying assumptions about childhood and children's roles. The study examines the political and pedagogical frameworks that guide how children's participation is actually implemented in practice.
Key points
- Policy agendas on children's rights have the power to shape what children can learn to do and be in society
- Policy documents are underpinned by pedagogical assumptions about how childhood is socially and culturally constructed
- The meanings attributed to 'child participation' in policy constitute the political framework for micro-pedagogical learning experiences
- Understanding how child participation is defined in policies is crucial because these definitions influence practice
Limitations
This is a content analysis of policy documents rather than an evaluation of actual child participation outcomes or implementations. The document does not provide empirical evidence about whether policy definitions of child participation actually improve children's experiences or well-being in practice.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the meanings of ‘child participation’ in international and European policy agendas on children(’s rights). The premise here is that policy agendas informed by children’s rights principles have the power to shape what a child can (learn) to do and be in a given society. Furthermore, the policy agendas analysed in this study are underpinned by pedagogical assumptions concerning the socio-cultural construction of childhood as a category and the spaces of participation that are dedicated and/or conceded to flesh-and-blood children. It is crucially important to explore the meanings of the ‘child-participation’ duo of terms as they are used in policy documents, because the values and principles thus conveyed constitute the political framework within which micro-pedagogical learning experiences, involving both children and adults, are constructed.