Peer-reviewed article
Regulating Bodies: Children and Sexual Violence
Heather R. Hlavka ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-sonnet-5-5This article argues that common ways of thinking about children and childhood make it very hard for young people to be recognised as victims of sexual assault. It says that social science research has largely left out children and youth when studying sexual violence. The author describes this silencing as a form of epistemic violence, meaning that people's knowledge and voices are erased. The author also argues that feminist researchers should draw attention to Institutional Review Boards, which act as gatekeepers over whose voices are represented in research.
Key points
- Disciplines have been silent on sexual violence, and children and youth are left out of social science research.
- Dominant frameworks of children and childhood make child sexual assault a discursive impossibility for most young people.
- Silencing is a form of epistemic violence and these erasures are fundamental to understanding violence and power.
- Institutional Review Boards act as gatekeepers of representation and voice.
- Feminist researchers should call attention to the undermining qualities of these review boards.
Limitations
Only a short abstract is available, so the evidence, methods and any specific country or setting are not stated. It is a conceptual argument and does not measure how common sexual violence is or test any intervention.
Abstract
The interdisciplinary silences on sexual violence and the omission of children and youth from social science research speak volumes of the power of the child as a flexible, cultural signifier. In this article, I argue that dominant frameworks of children and childhood make child sexual assault a discursive impossibility for most young people. The epistemic violence of silencing matters, and it is these erasures that are fundamental to understanding violence and power. I argue it is paramount for feminist researchers to call attention to the undermining qualities of Institutional Review Boards that act as gatekeepers of representation and voice.