Peer-reviewed article
Pandemics, epidemics and inequities in routine childhood vaccination coverage: a rapid review
Nick J Spencer, Rita Nathawad, Emmanuele Arpin, Samantha Ann Johnson ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This rapid review examined how pandemics and epidemics affect inequities in childhood vaccination coverage. The researchers searched for studies comparing vaccination coverage between different populations during pandemics, particularly looking at how COVID-19 disrupted vaccination programmes. Despite screening nearly 2,000 abstracts, no studies met the inclusion criteria, revealing a significant gap in the research literature on this topic.
Key points
- Pandemics disrupt health infrastructure and divert resources from preventive care, including vaccination programmes
- COVID-19 control measures resulted in reductions in vaccination coverage
- Existing inequities in routine childhood vaccination coverage are well documented
- No published studies directly examined the intersection of pandemics and vaccination inequities in the included evidence
- The review identified a critical research gap on how pandemics exacerbate or modify existing vaccination inequities
Limitations
This is a methodology paper reporting a null finding—no eligible studies were identified. It cannot provide evidence about the actual impact of pandemics on vaccination inequities, only that this specific question has not been adequately studied in the literature.
Abstract
Inequity in routine childhood vaccination coverage is well researched. Pandemics disrupt infrastructure and divert health resources from preventive care, including vaccination programmes, leading to increased vaccine preventable morbidity and mortality. COVID-19 control measures have resulted in coverage reductions. We conducted a rapid review of the impact of pandemics on existing inequities in routine vaccination coverage. PICO search framework: Population: children 0-18 years; Intervention/exposure: pandemic/epidemic; Comparison: inequality; Outcome: routine vaccination coverage. The review demonstrates a gap in the literature as none of the 29 papers selected for full-paper review from 1973 abstracts identified from searches met the inclusion criteria.