Peer-reviewed article
Profile of Parent-Child Well-Being in Immigrant Families
Li M, Le Q, Dong X ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This study examined the mental health patterns of 804 parent-child pairs from immigrant families, categorizing them into four groups based on whether parents and children had depressive symptoms. Most families (71%) had both happy parents and happy children, while 17% had depressed parents but happy children, 8% had happy parents but depressed children, and only 4% had both depressed. The researchers found some differences in family characteristics across these groups, such as age and income, but concluded that more research is needed to understand what helps families thrive.
Key points
- 71% of immigrant parent-child dyads were classified as happy-parent-happy-child, representing the largest group
- 17% were depressed-parent-happy-child, 8% were happy-parent-depressed-child, and 3.5% were both depressed
- Parents in the depressed-parent-happy-child group were older and had lower incomes compared to the happy-parent-happy-child group
- No significant differences were found between happy-parent-happy-child and depressed-parent-depressed-child groups in sociodemographic variables
- The study identifies a need for future research to understand predictors of parent-child well-being to inform intervention strategies
Limitations
The document does not specify which countries the immigrant families came from or settled in, limiting understanding of cultural and contextual factors. The study is descriptive and does not test any intervention or explain causal mechanisms for the observed well-being patterns.
Abstract
Abstract Earlier caregiving research focused on psychological well-being of either caregivers or care recipients, while less is known about the caregiving pattern with optimal outcome for both caregivers and care recipients. Data were from the PINE and PIETY studies, with 804 parent-child dyads. Depressive symptoms were measured by PHQ-9 with a cutoff of 5 distinguishing happy or depressed. Parent-child dyads were divided into four groups: happy-parent-happy-child (HPHC, n=572, 71.1%), depressed-parent-happy-child (DPHC, n=139, 17.3%), happy-parent-depressed-child (HPDC, n=65, 8.1%), and depressed-parent-depressed-child (DPDC, n=28, 3.5%). Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare the sociodemographic differences among the groups. Compared to the HPHC group, the DPHC group had older parents, more mother-child dyads and lower-income children, the HPDC group had more female children. However, there was no significant difference between the HPHC and the DPDC group. Future research could explore the predictors of parent-child well-being to inform intervention strategies.