Policy document
An end to inaction: Addressing female genital mutilation in Canada
Klara Hillmann ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This study examines why Canada lags behind other developed nations in addressing female genital mutilation (FGM) and what it can learn from policy approaches in the UK, Netherlands, Germany, and France. The research involved interviews with nine experts and analysis of legislative frameworks in four European countries. The study recommends Canada establish a coordinated national policy framework with a lead ministry, including an FGM prevalence study, multi-agency guidance, and professional training. The recommendations are prioritized for short-, medium-, and long-term implementation within the context of Canada's gender-based violence strategy.
Key points
- Canada is lagging behind other countries in tackling FGM
- A multi-sector policy framework with a lead ministry and national action plan is recommended
- Key action items include an FGM prevalence study, multi-agency guide, and professional training
- Policies from the UK, Netherlands, Germany, and France were assessed for effectiveness and feasibility
- Canada's Strategy to Prevent and Address Gender-Based Violence provides a policy window for FGM action
Limitations
The study does not report empirical evidence on the prevalence or health outcomes of FGM in Canada, nor does it evaluate the effectiveness of interventions already implemented in the comparative countries. The findings are based on expert interviews and policy analysis rather than population-based data.
Abstract
Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a human rights and health issue affecting women and girls across the world. As Canada is lagging behind other countries in tackling FGM, this study addresses this gap. The research includes interviews with nine experts in Canada and Europe, and a case study analysis examining the legislative and policy frameworks in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany, and France. Drawing on the research findings, the study recommends creating a multi-sector policy framework on FGM with a lead ministry and a national action plan. Key action plan items include an FGM prevalence study, a multi-agency guide, and training formats for relevant professionals. These policies are assessed based on effectiveness and feasibility criteria, and recommended for short-, medium-, or long-term implementation. For Canada, it is time to end inaction and Canada’s Strategy to Prevent and Address Gender-Based Violence provides now an important policy window for addressing FGM.