Peer-reviewed article
Psychometric evaluation of the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale in a Flemish context in early post-partum mothers.
Yaël Vanharen, Marie Verstraete, An Van Berendoncks, Dominique Mannaerts, Eva Goossens ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Dutch Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS) in a Flemish population of early postpartum mothers. Researchers tested the scale's validity and reliability by having expert panels review it and comparing it with another bonding assessment tool in 128 mothers measured on day 2 after birth. The MIBS showed acceptable content validity overall but had moderate internal consistency and limited agreement with the comparison tool. The study could not demonstrate that the MIBS was superior to the existing Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire.
Key points
- Expert panel consensus confirmed face validity of the Flemish MIBS, though 'resentful' and 'aggressive' items had low content validity
- Scale Content Validity Index/Average was 0.89, indicating acceptable overall content validity
- Internal consistency was moderate (Cronbach's alpha = 0.66)
- Moderate correlation between MIBS and PBQ scores (Kendall's Tau = 0.27, P < 0.001), but significant disagreement in classification of disrupted bonding (P = 0.015)
- Combined feeding was associated with higher rates of disrupted bonding (P = 0.007)
Limitations
The study is primarily a validation study of a measurement tool rather than an intervention evaluation, and it does not assess long-term developmental outcomes of infants. The cross-sectional design and single timepoint (day 2 postpartum) limit understanding of how bonding develops over time or how it relates to actual child well-being outcomes.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A strong mother-infant bond supports healthy development and leads to better long-term outcomes for both mothers and infants. Tools like the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS) enable objective assessment of this bond. This study examined key psychometric properties of the Dutch MIBS in a Flemish population. METHODS: This study comprised two subsequent parts. First, face and content validity were assessed by an expert panel of healthcare providers (n = 17) and mothers (n = 6). Second, convergent and concurrent validity were assessed based on cross-sectional data collection. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed. Evidence based on relationships with demographic and clinical variables was examined to support the validity of the Dutch MIBS. RESULTS: Data were collected from 128 mothers who completed the MIBS and Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ) on day 2 postpartum. Experts reached consensus on the face validity of the Dutch version of the MIBS in a Flemish context. Items showed adequate Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI) (≥0.79), except for the "resentful" and "aggressive" items. The scale achieved a Scale Content Validity Index/Average (SCVI/Ave) of 0.89, although internal consistency was moderate (α = 0.66). MIBS and PBQ scores correlated moderately (Kendall's Tau T = 0.27, P < 0.001). Fisher's exact test showed a significant difference in the proportion of mothers classified with disrupted bonding depending on the tool (P = 0.015). Combined feeding was associated with a higher rate of disrupted bonding (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: This study found that the Flemish MIBS tool had acceptable content validity, except for "resentful" and "aggressive." Reliability was moderate and convergent validity with PBQ was limited, with substantial discordant classification of disrupted bonding. The superiority to the PBQ-tool could not be demonstrated.