Other
Platform Governance in the Prevention of Child Radicalization in Indonesia: A Policy Network Analysis
Yuseptia Angretnowati, Machya Astuti Dewi, Melaty Anggraini ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-sonnet-5-5This article looks at how Indonesia's national action plan for preventing and countering violent extremism (RAN-PE) has changed from a policy-network approach to a whole-of-government approach. Using qualitative methods, it finds that this approach does not yet treat digital platforms as actors outside the traditional policy network. Coordination among state institutions on communications and cyber issues has grown, but the government has not effectively regulated the infrastructural power of digital platforms. This gap is especially visible in cases of child radicalization. The authors recommend adding platform governance to the whole-of-government framework.
Key points
- Indonesia's RAN-PE has shifted from a policy-network perspective toward a whole-of-government approach.
- The whole-of-government approach does not yet fully recognize digital platforms as actors beyond the traditional P/CVE policy network.
- Coordination among state institutions has developed on communications and cyber issues.
- The government has not effectively regulated the infrastructural power of digital platforms.
- The study recommends platform governance as a complement to the whole-of-government framework for radicalization in digital spaces.
Limitations
Only the abstract is available, so the data sources, sample and methods are not described. It is a qualitative policy analysis and does not test an intervention or measure outcomes for children.
Abstract
This article examines the governance transition in Indonesia’s Preventing/Countering Violent Extremism (P/CVE) policy. It traces the governance perspective used in the National Action Plan for the Prevention and Countering of Violent Extremism Leading to Terrorism (RAN-PE), which has shifted from a policy-network perspective toward a whole-of-government approach. Using qualitative methods, the study finds that the whole-of-government approach does not yet fully recognize digital platforms as actors beyond the traditional P/CVE policy network. Although coordination among state institutions has developed in addressing communications and cyber issues, the government has not effectively regulated the infrastructural power of digital platforms. This limitation is particularly visible in cases of child radicalization. The study therefore recommends strengthening P/CVE efforts through platform governance as a complement to the whole-of-government framework in responding to radicalization in digital spaces.