Peer-reviewed article
FAMILIAL AND SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC DETERMINANTS OF PLACE OF DEATH: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE UTAH POPULATION DATABASE
·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This study is not relevant to child well-being. It examines where older adults (aged 50 and above) in Utah died between 1998 and 2016, looking at how family support and sociodemographic factors influence whether deaths occurred at home or in healthcare facilities. The research uses population-level data to identify associations between having living spouses or children and place of death. While the study mentions family presence, it focuses on end-of-life outcomes for older adults rather than children's health, development, protection or participation.
Key points
Limitations
This document does not address child well-being, child health outcomes, child development, child protection, or any intervention targeting children. It concerns mortality patterns in older adults only.
Abstract
Abstract Consistent with preferences, home deaths in the US increasing — yet most Americans still die in hospitals or other healthcare facilities. Although declining health has been considered the primary factor influencing place of death, few studies have examined how family support and sociodemographic factors influence place of death. This study examined a population-based cohort of 205,932 decedents aged 50+ who died in Utah between 1998 and 2016. Using multivariate logistic regression models, we found that having a living spouse or child was associated with decreased odds of a healthcare facility death (spouse: AOR= 0.62, CI 0.65-0.59; child: AOR = 0.80, CI 0.79-0.82). Additionally, educational attainment (graduate degree: AOR = 0.95, CI 0.91-0.99) and non-Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity (AOR = 0.81, CI 0.79-0.85) were associated with decreased odds of a home death. Our findings highlight the importance of families in place of death and suggest that sociodemographic and economic disparities persist even in death.