Peer-reviewed article
Perceived quality and significance of Early Childhood Care and Education in Pakistan: a scoping review of evidence from the point of view of practitioners, parents and children
Fatema Y. Jangbarwala, Susana Castro ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-sonnet-5-5This scoping review maps 32 empirical studies on how quality in Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) is understood in Pakistan. It looks at the views of practitioners, parents and children. The authors followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and grouped the evidence into five themes. They conclude that the views of different stakeholders on what quality and significance mean in ECCE are not well covered. They call for further research using approaches suited to the local context to inform future policy and practice.
Key points
- The review synthesized evidence from 32 studies.
- Five themes emerged: systemic challenges, structural, process, outcomes-based and orientation quality dimensions.
- Diverse stakeholder views in conceptualizing quality and significance of ECCE are lacking.
- Quality in ECCE is seen as important but complex, because it standardizes ECCE against universal assessments and measures.
- Further research using contextually relevant approaches is needed to construct the meaning of quality and shape future ECCE policies and practice.
Limitations
Only the abstract is available, so details on the included studies, their quality, and the specific findings within each theme are not known. As a scoping review, it maps the evidence rather than testing whether any intervention works.
Abstract
Quality in Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) is deemed important and yet complex, as it standardizes ECCE against universal assessments and measures. There is a need to explore how contextually meaningful understanding of quality is being considered. To fill this gap, a scoping review was undertaken to map empirical studies and understand how quality is perceived from the point of view of practitioners, parents, and children in Pakistan. Adopting Arksey O’Malley framework, the review synthesized evidence from 32 studies which led to five themes: systemic challenges, structural, process, outcomes-based and orientation quality dimensions. Results show that diverse stakeholder views in conceptualizing quality and significance of ECCE are lacking. Further research using contextually relevant approaches to construct the meaning of quality is identified to shape future ECCE policies and practice for Pakistan.