Peer-reviewed article
Prospecting the attachment research field: a move to the level of engagement
Carlo Schuengel, Marije L. Verhage, Robbie Duschinsky ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This paper reviews 75 meta-analyses on child-parent attachment research to understand trends in the field. It finds that effect sizes in attachment research may need recalibration and identifies shifting research interests toward interventions and mental health while declining attention to attachment relationships and representations. The authors argue that future attachment research should engage more directly with stakeholders addressing real-world child welfare challenges.
Key points
- Attachment research effect size benchmarks may need adjustment to small (r = .10), medium (r = .20), and large (r = .30)
- 53% of meta-analyses tested attachment theory rather than practical applications
- Increasing research interest in interventions, mental health, and attachment anxiety/avoidance dimensions
- Declining research focus on attachment relationships and representations, except for sensitivity and fathers
- Future attachment research should engage stakeholders to address child welfare challenges
Limitations
This is a literature review and bibliometric analysis that describes research trends rather than evaluating outcomes for children. It does not assess the actual effectiveness of any interventions on child well-being, only the patterns of research publications.
Abstract
This paper prospected the evidence synthesized in meta-analyses on child–parent attachment to discuss its implications for the future of attachment research. Based on the 75 identified meta-analyses, effect size benchmarks may need to be adjusted to small (r = .10), medium (r = .20), and large (r = .30). Topics of attachment meta-analyses predominantly (53%) reflected interest in testing theory. Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications (k = 7,595) that cited these meta-analyses reflect waxing uptake in work on interventions, mental health, and attachment anxiety/avoidance and waning uptake in work on attachment relationships and representations, except for the subtopics of sensitivity and fathers. Prospects for scientifically rigorous research are to be found in engagement with stakeholders working to address important societal challenges. Promoting nurturing care and reducing harm in child welfare contain “Goldilocks-problems” that are amenable to incremental progress while simultaneously advancing theory and methods.