Peer-reviewed article
Local constructions of gender-based violence amongst IDPs in northern Uganda: analysis of archival data collected using a gender- and age-segmented participatory ranking methodology
Alastair Ager, Carolyn Bancroft, Elizabeth Berger, Lindsay Stark ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This study analyzed qualitative data from 64 group discussions with women, men, girls, and boys in four internally displaced persons camps in northern Uganda to understand how different groups view and rank forms of gender-based violence. Rape was identified as the greatest concern, followed by marital rape and intimate partner violence, with all groups noting that these forms of violence were generally normalized within the camps. The research found that gender roles, economic deprivation, and the physical and social characteristics of camp settings were key factors explaining violence prevalence. The study demonstrates that community-identified root causes like economic hardship and gender norms should inform violence prevention programs.
Key points
- Rape ranked as the greatest GBV concern (mean rank 3.4), followed by marital rape (4.5) and intimate partner violence (4.9)
- Girls ranked all forms of GBV as higher priority concerns than other participant groups
- GBV was generally considered normalized within the camp environment
- Gender roles, power imbalances, economic deprivation, and camp physical/social characteristics emerged as key explanatory factors
- Participatory ranking methodology proved efficient at identifying local constructions of challenges to inform programming
Limitations
This is a secondary analysis of formative qualitative data from 2006, so findings reflect local perceptions and rankings rather than epidemiological prevalence. The study was conducted in one district in one country during a specific conflict period, which may limit generalizability to other IDP settings or populations.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gender-based violence (GBV) is a significant problem in conflict-affected settings. Understanding local constructions of such violence is crucial to developing preventive and responsive interventions to address this issue. METHODS: This study reports on a secondary analysis of archived data collected as part of formative qualitative work - using a group participatory ranking methodology (PRM) - informing research on the prevalence of GBV amongst IDPs in northern Uganda in 2006. Sixty-four PRM group discussions were held with women, with men, with girls (aged 14 to 18 years), and with boys (aged 14 to 18 years) selected on a randomized basis across four internally displaced persons (IDP) camps in Lira District. Discussions elicited problems facing women in the camps, and - through structured participatory methods - consensus ranking of their importance and narrative accounts explaining these judgments. RESULTS: Amongst forms of GBV faced by women, rape was ranked as the greatest concern amongst participants (with a mean problem rank of 3.4), followed by marital rape (mean problem rank of 4.5) and intimate partner violence (mean problem rank of 4.9). Girls ranked all forms of GBV as higher priority concerns than other participants. Discussions indicated that these forms of GBV were generally considered normalized within the camp. Gender roles and power, economic deprivation, and physical and social characteristics of the camp setting emerged as key explanatory factors in accounts of GBV prevalence, although these played out in different ways with respect to differing forms of violence. CONCLUSIONS: All groups acknowledged GBV to represent a significant threat - among other major concerns such as transportation, water, shelter, food and security - for women residing in the camps. Given evidence of the significantly higher risk in the camp of intimate partner violence and marital rape, the relative prominence of the issue of rape in all rankings suggests normalization of violence within the home. Programs targeting reduction in GBV need to address community-identified root causes such as economic deprivation and social norms related to gender roles. More generally, PRM appears to offer an efficient means of identifying local constructions of prevailing challenges in a manner that can inform programming.
Findings the Hub has extracted
Each claim below is labelled by its type of design and links back to this report.
- Intervention
- Participatory ranking methodology (PRM) group discussions to understand local constructions of GBV and identify community-perceived root causes to inform prevention programming
- Population
- 64 groups of women, men, girls (aged 14-18), and boys (aged 14-18) in four IDP camps in Lira District, northern Uganda
Key finding
Rape identified as greatest GBV concern with mean problem rank of 3.4 across all groups