Peer-reviewed article
Event related potentials in children with internet addiction disorder
Bakhtadze S, Khachapuridze N, Geladze N ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This study examined attention problems in 70 children aged 5-18 years with internet addiction disorder (IAD) using a neurological test called P300, which measures how quickly the brain responds to stimuli. Children with IAD showed delayed brain responses compared to children without IAD, suggesting internet addiction is linked to attention difficulties. The researchers conclude that IAD affects children's social well-being, though the study does not describe what causes IAD or how to prevent it.
Key points
- Internet addiction disorder affects approximately 40 percent of children and adolescents
- Children with IAD showed significantly increased P300 latency (350-375 milliseconds) compared to controls with normal latency
- P300 amplitude was normal in the IAD group, indicating the attention deficit is specifically about response speed rather than overall brain activity
- IAD is commonly related with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
- The study used a neurological measurement (P300) rather than questionnaires to assess attention
Limitations
The study does not describe the characteristics of countries or settings where the research was conducted, and it does not evaluate any intervention to address IAD or its attention-related effects. The document is a cross-sectional comparison and cannot determine whether IAD causes attention problems or whether attention problems lead to IAD.
Abstract
Introduction Internet addiction disorder (IAD) is defined as one of the commonest disorder in children and adolescents affecting 40 percent of them. Although it does not cause mental disorders it is known that IAD is commonly related with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The best approach to asses attention is recording of event related potentials (ERPs) especially late response like P300. There are growing evidence regarding assessment of attention in IAD with different questionnaires but less is known about evidence received with more valid measurements like P300. Objectives The aim of our study was to measure attention parameters in IAD subjects by using the most valid test–latency and amplitude of P300. We have examined 70 children with IAD aged 5-18 years. Children were divided into two groups: Group 1 (40 children) was matched as a study group including children with IAD and group 2 controls (30 children) without IAD and without ADHD. Methods IAD was assessed by Young IAD scale. Children with Young scale less than 20 and with IQ less than 85 were excluded from the study. Recording of P300 was done by international protocol using oddball paradigm method. Statistical analysis was done by SSPS 26. Results In study group increase in P300 latency was found (mean range 350-375 msc) while amplitude was normal (p <0.05). In controls both parameters were within normal range. Conclusions IAD could be related with attention disorders causing poor attention span. This evidence is very important as they affect internet addicted children and adolescents’ social well being. Disclosure No significant relationships.