Other
Digital Child Labour, the Latent Form of Exploitation?
Riya Gulati ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-sonnet-5-5This article looks at digital child labour, a less visible form of exploitation linked to online platforms and technology-mediated work. It considers how children's content creation, informal digital tasks and online commercial activity can blur the line between learning, recreation and labour. It reviews how international labour standards, Indian child-protection laws and selected European regulations deal with these risks. The article concludes that current laws give important protections but do not fully fit the features of digital labour, and it calls for stronger safeguards and platform accountability.
Key points
- Digital work can give children skills and early practical exposure.
- It can also expose children to privacy risks, cyberbullying, grooming, sexual exploitation and academic disruption.
- Children's data, time and images can be monetised.
- Existing legal frameworks are not fully adapted to weak employer-employee relationships, transnational reach and concealed forms of payment.
- The article calls for stronger legal safeguards, platform accountability, coordinated enforcement, public awareness and better data collection.
Limitations
The abstract does not describe the research method or give any data on how many children are affected. It focuses on Indian law and selected European developments, so it says little about other regions, including Africa.
Abstract
This article examined digital child labour as a less visible form of child exploitation emerging from the expansion of online platforms and technology-mediated work. It considered how children’s participation in content creation, informal digital tasks, online commercial activity and other platform-based practices could blur the boundary between learning, recreation and labour. The analysis showed that digital work could provide skills and early practical exposure, but could also place children in unregulated environments marked by privacy risks, cyberbullying, grooming, sexual exploitation, academic disruption and the monetisation of their data, time and images. The article further assessed how international labour standards, Indian child-protection laws and selected European regulatory developments addressed these risks. It found that existing legal frameworks offered important protections but were not fully adapted to the distinctive features of digital labour, including weak employer-employee relationships, transnational reach and concealed forms of remuneration. The article concluded that stronger legal safeguards, platform accountability, coordinated enforcement, public awareness and improved data collection were required to protect children without excluding them from beneficial digital participation.