Peer-reviewed article

The Aetiology of Child Sexual Abuse: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence

Estelle Clayton, Christine Jones, Jon Brown, Julie Scott Taylor · 1 May 2018

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a critical review of empirical evidence relating to the aetiology of child sexual abuse (CSA) published over the last 15 years. The current review found that the psychology, criminal history and prior victimisation of the perpetrator and the gender, disability status, sexuality and family circumstances of the victim are important risk factors for CSA. Offence characteristics such as the offender‐victim relationship, modus operandi of the perpetrator and absence of a capable guardian are also found to be important markers of risk. We make suggestions for future research frameworks and designs, and we discuss the implications of the evidence for future primary prevention initiatives, practice and policy. We use this evidence to make recommendations for the development of child maltreatment theory more generally. ‘A critical review of empirical evidence relating to the aetiology of child sexual abuse published over the last 15 years’ Key Practitioner Messages Understanding of CSA perpetration is not well advanced and it is likely to be far more complex than currently thought. Intersectionality exists between cultural and sociocultural influences for CSA. The causes and consequences of CSA are both different to and the same as other forms of maltreatment, but we do not yet have sufficiently nuanced evidence to say how much these diverge and converge. The evidence is mixed and difficult to interpret regarding offenders' own childhood experiences of CSA.