Peer-reviewed article
Labour market strategies addressing precarious employment and its impacts: A systematic review
Gunn V, Vignola E, Wegman D, Hogstedt C, Bodin T et al. ·
Summary
Written by AI, not yet AICS's view · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001This systematic review examines interventions addressing precarious employment among adult workers and its public health impacts. The review included 23 studies evaluating diverse strategies such as tax reforms, labour legislation, and apprenticeships. Most interventions addressed only one or two dimensions of precarious employment, and evaluation studies lacked key details that would enable generalization of findings.
Key points
- Review covered 23 studies from 2000-2021 evaluating diverse strategies including tax reforms, industrial disputes legislation, business registration, union strategies, social benefits, and youth apprenticeships
- Most initiatives had potential to tackle precarious employment but typically acted on only one or two dimensions of the problem
- Evaluation components were missing key details, limiting generalizability
- Heterogeneity in study designs, initiative purposes, economic and political contexts, and target populations made synthesis difficult
- Authors call for multidisciplinary collaborations to implement and evaluate policies regulating precarious employment
Limitations
This review focuses on adult workers and does not specifically address children's well-being, making it outside the scope of child-focused analysis. The heterogeneity of interventions, contexts, and study designs limits what can be concluded about effectiveness for any specific intervention.
Abstract
Abstract Background Precarious employment (PE), characterized by reduced worker rights, and employment and income insecurity, has complex public health implications including negative impacts on workers’ mental and physical health, occupational health and safety, wellbeing, and inequities in access to health and social protections. There is, however, a knowledge gap regarding effectiveness of interventions. We describe findings from a review of evaluated interventions with potential to address PE. Methods Our systematic review followed the 2020 PRISMA framework and covered PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and sources of grey literature. We included qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods studies evaluating initiatives to reduce workers’ PE published from 2000 to 2021 and focused on adult workers. Results The 23 eligible studies from across the world evaluated diverse strategies addressing PE including tax and trade reforms, industrial disputes legislation, business registration, and use of incentives to stimulate permanent contracts. Also included were union strategies to reach precarious workers, the provision of social benefits, and youth apprenticeships. Generally, while most initiatives had the potential to tackle certain PE aspects, they usually acted only on one or two PE dimensions. Additionally, the evaluation components were missing key details, thus, limiting the generalizability of findings, as did the heterogeneity of study designs, initiative purposes, economic and political context, and diverse populations targeted. Conclusions The increase in PE prevalence and its complex health implications requires sustainable upstream public health solutions. Multidisciplinary collaborations among public health and occupational health practitioners along with researchers, evaluation specialists, economists, and politicians could facilitate the implementation and evaluation of policies and standards regulating and monitoring PE and its health impacts. Key messages • Precarious employment has complex public health implications. • Sustainable solutions to address precarious employment must be upstream and multidisciplinary.